GOP might do well to give Ron Unz's ideas a second look

Republicans have been wringing their hands since last November’s
election, worried their party lacks leaders for the future and a
credible strategy for winning votes in California’s increasingly
important Hispanic community.

But Ron Unz isn’t fretting.

The 37-year-old Silicon Valley entrepreneur, the financial muscle
behind last year’s move to end bilingual education in California,
thinks he knows how his fellow Republicans can escape the
political wilderness they’ve wandered into. And if you nudge him
a little, Unz will admit he wouldn’t mind leading the way.

Recent accounts in The Orange County Register and elsewhere
suggest that English immersion is working. Many teachers and
parents who opposed Proposition 227 have changed their minds
about the measure, saying children are learning English far faster
than they expected.

“These reports are extremely heartening,” Unz said in an interview
from his Palo Alto home. “This shows that Latino children can
learn English pretty much like all the other immigrant children in
California who haven’t had bilingual education. That certainly
seems plausible.”

Unz was unfairly cast as anti-immigrant by opponents of
Proposition 227 last year. He is a second-generation American
who has written extensively on the value of immigration. He has
long encouraged GOP leaders to embrace newcomers as the
lifeblood of a dynamic, pro-business party.

In 1994, Unz opposed Proposition 187, which sought to limit
public services to illegal immigrants. That same year he ran a
Republican primary campaign against former Gov. Pete Wilson,
whose message blaming immigration for the state’s fiscal woes
was then at its peak. Unz spent more than $1 million of his own
money against Wilson and embarrassed Wilson by winning 34
percent of the vote.

By seeking to end bilingual education, Unz was not scapegoating
Hispanics. It was just the opposite. He argued that bilingual
education was a well-intended failure that was keeping
immigrants, and the children of immigrants, from reaching their
full potential in an English-speaking society.

Many Republican leaders, unsure of their own convictions,
distanced themselves from Unz and his initiative. Now, as the first
results trickle in, they may want to take another look at his ideas
and tactics. And he might make another run for high office.

“I’ll see what happens,” Unz said, “I’ve run for office before, and
the idea of running in the future is certainly something I’d
consider.”

Many Hispanic activists and academics scoff at the notion of Unz
as a viable statewide candidate. No matter what his motives, they
say, Unz was forever tarred as anti-Hispanic by the campaign over
227.

“One of the key things about politics is you don’t want the
opposition to define you,” said Fernando Guerra, a political
science professor at Loyola Marymount University. “Ron Unz let
the opposition define him as anti-Latino. That will be difficult to
overcome.”

Even if Proposition 227 turns out to be good for Hispanic
children? Even if Unz was right?

“He might have been right for all the wrong reasons,” Guerra said.
“He might have gotten us to improve in all the wrong ways—with
a blunt instrument instead of the precision of a thoughtful
surgeon.”

Guerra may be right. In an age when politics is more about
perception than ever before, it is possible that the image of Ron
Unz as a bigot might be more powerful than his record and his
results. Just last month, after all, several Hispanic groups blasted
Democratic Assembly Speaker Antonio Villaraigosa for
appointing Unz to a task force on local government finance as if he
were some sort of war criminal.

But even if Unz falls short as a candidate, Republicans could do
worse than seize on the same opportunity-based message that
drove his ballot measure. By following the path Unz has blazed,
the GOP would stop patronizing Hispanic voters by treating them
as a monolithic group and start seeing them for what they are—
independent-thinking individuals.



Comments are closed.